the comic literally says “constructing a society” which means its not anarchy.
how does every scrap of culture containing the word “anarchy” attract these experts who were apparently born with these incorrect assumptions about anarchism, SINCE THEY’VE NEVER READ A SINGLE DAMN AUTHORITATIVE WORD ON THE SUBJECT
when will people understand that anarchy as a form of society is different from the colloquial use of the word to mean absolute chaos (which by the way is probably the result of a deliberate attempt to undermine the former)
I’m a Marxist, not an Anarchist, but I used to be one. That’s mostly wrong.
Anarchism isn’t about having no society, but one established based on full horizontalism, like a spiderweb of communes. This is opposed to Marxism, which seeks full collective ownership and planning in a global Socialist republic (kinda like Star Trek).
Just saying that thats not anarchy. Anarchy will never work its just unstable and will become some kind of system(which we see in this comic too)
Edit: for the people who downvoted me, the comic literally says “constructing a society” which means its not anarchy.
how does every scrap of culture containing the word “anarchy” attract these experts who were apparently born with these incorrect assumptions about anarchism, SINCE THEY’VE NEVER READ A SINGLE DAMN AUTHORITATIVE WORD ON THE SUBJECT
That is literally anarchy you clown.
Anarchy is not no rules lawless free for all MadMax world.
Anarchy is when you run around a room waving your hands and screaming “This is Anarchy!!!”
Finally, an actual anarchist.
when will people understand that anarchy as a form of society is different from the colloquial use of the word to mean absolute chaos (which by the way is probably the result of a deliberate attempt to undermine the former)
I’m a Marxist, not an Anarchist, but I used to be one. That’s mostly wrong.
Anarchism isn’t about having no society, but one established based on full horizontalism, like a spiderweb of communes. This is opposed to Marxism, which seeks full collective ownership and planning in a global Socialist republic (kinda like Star Trek).
It’s funny, because you actually dug a deeper hole with this edit.
It’s the assumption of altruism that gets me.
mutual benefit, not altruism. capitalism has the same assumption except it has different incentives.
As long as all the participants buy into the system without coercion or under the threat of starving, who the fuck cares?