• tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I watched this today and really enjoyed it.

    I’m not going to pretend it’s the greatest or deepest sci-fi film ever made, but it’s fun if you are into dystopian; it’s almost Gilliam esc. but it doesn’t quite embrace it fully.

    The Messianic cult leader is a little on the nose and as 2D as his realife inspiration is.

    It doesn’t explore all the possibilities or offer real depth to what is a complex topic, but as a soft sci-fi story it’s a fun and sometimes funny way to pass a couple of hours.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just went over to metacritic to see how the film is being reviewed, and BOY are the chuds mad. I saw a literal Nazi username saying the movie sucks blah blah blah. Went to report it but you need an account for that. Makes me want to see it in theatres even more now

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Just saw the trailer, I like the tone, hope it’s good.

    I’m still mad at snow piercer… why the fuck do they need to be constantly moving? That’s the worse thing for heat insulation!

    • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Snow Piercer is not about a train. It’s about capitalism, communism, revolutions and anarchism. The train is the capitalist world and the final message is anarchist.

      • straightjorkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah, complaining about the science of Snowpiercer is kind of like complaining that the animals in Animal Farm talk

      • Aux@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It depends on which Snowpiercer you’re watching. The movie is about the revolution. The series is about lazy people fucking up the working system.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Okay sure but can’t you have all of that without the train?

        Imo a bunker would be a much better metaphor, especially since Ed Harris’ character believed their world was eternal (it was hard to believe it was running for that long).

        I like the director and his critique on capitalism but imo he did it wrong. Especially give that the ending…

        Tap for spoiler

        …was the self destruction of humanity, given the train crashed, not anarchy.

        Imo the movie would have been semi saved if they just showed a tribe of Eskimos at the end, not a polar bear.

        That would be perfect, it would show that humanity would live on, but clearly the capitalistic system that was preserved on a train was self destructive and always meant to crash.

        • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          But you can’t “derail” a bunker. And the point of the ending was that neither capitalism not communism are the answer.

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    The idea of 3D printed resurrection machines isn’t new. It’s pretty much the whole basis of the Undying Mercenaries series by B.V. Larson

    • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, but the concept also has a LOT of space to play in but most writers play it safe. Way too many just treat is as a handwavy checkpoint system and move on with the plot they care about.

      Soma (video game, not a book) was a really horrifying dive into being able to save and upload a consciousness. Not a lot of stories try to dive into how do you know if a “copy” of you is truly a copy. It’s like a Turing test on steroids trying to figure this out. Being able to practically test just how different someone can be from a single different event.

      It’s one of the things I really enjoyed about the Bobiverse series (although apparently later on they added the idea of a soul, which just kinda seems like a cop out to me)

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Not really a soul, more like an explanation why the bob clones are different and why they can’t just make 1:1 clones of an each other - even when their consciousness moves from one place to another.

        They just called it a “soul” in lack of a better name.

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah. The MC is a jackass but he does learn a bit over the series and there’s some depth to the thoughts on how little would react to being able to come back from dying repeatedly (and the first “training scenario”) under most scenarios.

        • PenguinMage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I enjoy that he’s just some shit kicker at the beginning and really has learned over the series (though there’s like 18 books now so it’s not hard to imagine). Though he is quite a Gary Sue.

  • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hmmm, interesting! I’ve seen a lot of ads for it but was unsure. Maybe something to watch when/if or comes to home watching?