• Gibibit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ah yes, solving design problems by asking players nicely.

    In a traditional MMO like World of Warcraft, it’s not like you build a base in the starter zone and leave it there for a week, because imagine how many bases would be stacking up. [But] that’s kind of how our game does work because you can end up with a lot of bases.

    I’m pretty sure most people dislike destroying their own stuff or alternatively, cleaning up. If you’re gonna let them have multiple bases instead of just one, what do you expect?

    Just speculating but: it sounds like they only tested this with small groups, and that worked. If that’s what you’re going for, you have to set up the game to play in small groups, not as an MMO… In hindsight they might wish they had put player bases in separate instances.

    • .Donuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      4 days ago

      An MMO (that sadly got cancelled) introduced base decay in where, if you hadn’t been in your base for a week, it started breaking down. This way, the world cleaned up itself. Was a cool idea

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The system works fine in, say, Conan, or Ark, or whatever survival game because those are small groups. If you’ve got thousands in a server, it’s going to be a mess.

      Hell, even Ultima Online had the brains to keep player houses to specific areas. This is not a new problem.