flamingos-cant@feddit.uk to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoDemocr(ule)acyfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up10file-text
arrow-up10imageDemocr(ule)acyfiles.catbox.moeflamingos-cant@feddit.uk to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 months agoPerhaps it’s not the most clear, but that absolutely is the standard convention for how to treat exponents, because it results in much simpler shorthand for writing things like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series Example on that page: -x-(1/2)x^2 -(1/3)x^3 -(1/4)x^4 … Using your definition you’d have to put a bunch of parenthesis: -x-(1/2)(x^2 )-(1/3)(x^3 )-(1/4)(x^4 )… And believe me physicists would hate you if you made them do this because they’d have to do it constantly.
Perhaps it’s not the most clear, but that absolutely is the standard convention for how to treat exponents, because it results in much simpler shorthand for writing things like this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series
Example on that page:
-x-(1/2)x^2 -(1/3)x^3 -(1/4)x^4 …
Using your definition you’d have to put a bunch of parenthesis: -x-(1/2)(x^2 )-(1/3)(x^3 )-(1/4)(x^4 )…
And believe me physicists would hate you if you made them do this because they’d have to do it constantly.