• deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I find the top three ratios interesting: there’s a tiny skew towards females but a huge skew towards males.

    It doesn’t show what the green threshold is though. From memory, the natural birth ratio is 49:51 m:f, so the female skew is only about 3% while the male skew is about 20%. Seven times larger.

    If I were colouring the map, I don’t think I’d have bothered with differentiating purple and green, or perhaps used more graduations.

    • Patariki@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just a guess, but I think the difference in a country like Qatar can be explained by the import of labor. They hire a workforce from a different country which tend to be dominantly male in those regions. And we’ve seen with the football WC how they’re developing.

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Omg is there infanticide going on in qatar and the likes? Or are people not registering female births?

    Please let it be the latter, as a bad solution amongst worse solutions.

  • OwlPaste@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Isn’t this mostly showing that females have longer lifespans and in countries where they have weird preference for boys, the skew towards male?

    • zarkony@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, plus migrant labor. I imagine most countries that skew male are only a percent or two off. The major outliers are the Persian gulf nations, because they are tiny and rich. All those extra men are migrant workers from poorer nations, sending money back home.