• Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s not a test, it is a demonstration. Basically a commercial.

  • Bubs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I mean, what better way to sell a new and untrusted device than to put your own trust (and life) in the product.

    Would you sell a bullet proof vest if you didn’t feel safe wearing it?

    Would you buy a bullet proof vest if its own inventor didn’t feel safe wearing it?

      • Bubs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Oh 100% you’re right.

        I’d wager this wasn’t one of their first tests (and maybe not even a test at all). Looks to me like an advertisement/publicity stunt/demonstration.

        I could be easily wrong since I haven’t researched this exact event, but I think it’s safe to assume it’s more than just a test since they have cameras out.

      • VeryInterestingTable@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Even if it does work being shot hurts like hell. Just test it on things that don’t feel pain a measure it? You could also totally die from internal bleeding even if the bullet was stopped by a vest.

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    People had lots of children back there. Somehow, they had to thinner their numbers. They even invent world wars for that reason.

  • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Reminds me of Richard Davis, fella who came up with one of, if not the first Kevlar bulletproof vest. Initial tests were great since Kevlar has five times more tensile strength than steel, but to put his money where his mouth was the crazy bastard shot himself point blank to prove a point.