Serious or irreverent welcome

  • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    “Hi nice to meet you I’m your soulmate and future wife and I’m going to fix you and we’ll help fix the world together”

    (i mean if someone said that exact phrase to me I’d probably run screaming lol. But you know.)

    • i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      On point number 3, I once got dunked on for saying that I didn’t know anything about the subject at hand when asked. The other person told me “Well, that’s just a cop out. Just make something up!”

      edit: clarification

  • sbird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    not hear, but read…see?: aluminium, your is possessive and you’re is you are (IT’S NOT THAT HARD IF YOU ARE FLUENT IN ENGLISH), it’s vs its (NOT THAT HARD EITHER FOR NATIVE SPEAKERS)

  • backscatter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    “Bosom”. Religious nuts shouldn’t have a monopoly on the word. Also, it makes me chuckle every time.

    • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s like the wholesome counterpart to “boob.” Both kinda sound like what they describe, but “bosom” feels classy.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’m less high now!

        I normally use it when talking about miniatures and toy train setups.

        “The miniature painted conifers with bits of snow really have the scene verisimilitude”

        I could still be very wrong.

      • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The general meaning is the appearance of truth or validity.

        But I usually use it to describe something that is “believable” even if the underlying premise is not. So a fantasy story that pays close attention to detail and is highly consistent might be described as having versimilitude. On the other hand, a story where the characters make out-of-character choices might be lacking versimilitude, even if there are no overtly “fictional” elements to the story.

        That’s usually how I’ve heard it used, not sure if it’s the “main” usage though.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Poorly! As I’m currently high and do not feel confident using it correctly!

        Looks cool though!

  • Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know.

    If we were honest, it’s the thing we should all be saying and hearing all day long. But it’s not. Quite the opposite, it’s among the rarest. Instead, people are shooting their certainties at one another, relentlessly.

    Not knowing something or not having an opinion on a question is not an issue. It’s to be expected, even if we were all geniuses (I’m certainly not one). Not doing the work to inform oneself could potentially be an issue but should not be as long we don’t pretend otherwise. It’s when one pretends to know, based on what one has heard someone else say, or because one wants to push a specific narrative that suits them, that shit starts hitting the fan. That’s when living together turn into the stinking shit hole it has turned into in which lies are fine (when they’re not adored) and facts have become suspicious if not dangerous.

    Obviously, I don’t know what I’m talking about.

  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Good forenoon to you!

    Also, I’m totally down with referring to the days of the Week by their etymological roots. Happy Day of Thor to you!