For anyone interested, there are some image poisoning tools out there to protect (glaze as example) your att or even attack (nightshade as examle) ai models directly
AFAIK it’s very model specific attacks and won’t work against other models. Their tool preserving art the same to human eye is great offering, and there’s always rigorous watermarking (esp. with strong contrast) as an universally effective option.
Open source ai’s shouldn’t be training on art that isn’t given to them either, should it? I get lemmy has a hard on for open source. But “open source” doesn’t give people free reign to steal other people’s work. If the art is freely offered I bet these tools wouldn’t be run on them.
For anyone interested, there are some image poisoning tools out there to protect (glaze as example) your att or even attack (nightshade as examle) ai models directly
AFAIK it’s very model specific attacks and won’t work against other models. Their tool preserving art the same to human eye is great offering, and there’s always rigorous watermarking (esp. with strong contrast) as an universally effective option.
Thank you very much for the additional details^^
deleted by creator
Then people should actually ask for consent for using other’s art as training data
Open source ai’s shouldn’t be training on art that isn’t given to them either, should it? I get lemmy has a hard on for open source. But “open source” doesn’t give people free reign to steal other people’s work. If the art is freely offered I bet these tools wouldn’t be run on them.