• deaf_fish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s a difference between industrialization for people and trade versus industrialization for money and power. One helps everyone, The other only helps capitalists.

    I wouldn’t necessarily look at China and USSR and say they are a good alternative. I prefer a more democratic socialism. My problem with capitalism is specifically the lack of choice of the people. We spend 8 out of 12 hours on average working for a company that we don’t get a vote in.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      There’s a difference between industrialization for people and trade versus industrialization for money and power.

      Not as far as the environment is concerned and frankly many will tell you running water and electricity are huge advantages regardless of how you get them.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        What? Yes, the environment can tell because there would be less pollution. The motivations are different. Do you think worker controlled industries would use the same tactics to over produce and polute the areas the workers live in? No one would benefit from that.

        I’m not saying we would reach zero pollution but there would be a lot less pollution.

        I have no problem with running water and electricity, most reasonable socialist would agree.