I want all the money I put in to be refunded in nonsequential bills, and give it to me in one of those fancy metal briefcases please.
If you generated this with AI, YOU HAVE BROUGHT GREAT DISHONOR UPON YOUR HOUSE!
even if you didn’t, A TRUE WARRIOR NEVER SPREADS ART GENERATED WITHOUT GLORY!
Alright I’m just gonna start blocking anyone that posts AI slop. I implore others to join me in letting these goobers post silently to the void.
No fun allowed.
Nice “gotcha”. Why don’t you ask AI to make me the soyjack and you the chad while you’re at it. If AI hallucinations fed by thousands of hours of stolen labor is what you classify as fun then you can keep it.
Nah. I’m gonna report it every time and write in the comments that this slop needs to be banned
ai
I feel like an old man I can’t fucking tell when things are AI generated anymore.
I just don’t care about it. So what if it’s generated by stable diffusion of not.
Better hope he’s not warming us up for future plans.
Aktion T4 was a campaign of mass murder by involuntary euthanasia which targeted people with disabilities in Nazi Germany.
The killings took place from September 1939 until the end of World War II in Europe in 1945; from 275,000 to 300,000 people were killed in psychiatric hospitals…
I’m having second thoughts about getting an official diagnosis 😅
I’m cool just saying I suspect I’m autistic, probably not though. Lovely weather, right?(moves Legos to hidden basement room and encrypts Minecraft and Satisfactory saves)
They’ll probably come for us adhd-ers too
where the actual fuck in my apartment am i going to hide the giant fucking millennium falcon lego
He’s already talked about “work camps” for people who are “addicted” to things like SSRIs. He was mask-off Nazi before Musk was (if only by a few weeks.)
He’s a disgrace to humanity.
He’s already talked about “work camps” for people who are “addicted” to things like SSRIs.
Disgrace to humanity is absolutely right, and somehow still now adequate for the piece of shit he is.
That being said, I can’t find a source for him talking about “work camps” for people who are “addicted” to things like SSRIs. The only thing related to SSRIs and him turning up for me is how he thinks it overprescribed. Could you provide a source that I could read up on and educate myself on?
Weird how many here calls this Ai with no real proof.
The only current evidence I see that this might be Ai generated is blur lines around the character in the second and third panel, but the consistency of such a stylized drawing remaining the same is so strong it’s either really well done Ai that included photoshopping or human art with photoshopping.
A lot of you saying it’s AI clearly don’t work with it or have any understanding of it, because getting this level of consistency across 3 panels is very difficult. We’re talking about doing extra training involved around this specific character just to make sure you can get this type of consistency with 3 separate poses (my experience with it so far is in photo editing along with other digital editing tools).
I feel like recently I’ve noticed a lot of people witch hunting real artists who make a small mistake or have a unique art style (like that of the webcomic There Are No Demons), and the default of calling anything generated by AI, even something that was actually well done, “slop” shows less of an actual analysis of the piece but blind band wagoning
If you pay attention to her shirt, you can see diagonal folding lines on the clothes because presumably one of her shoulder is higher than the other. The artist made it consistent across three panels and it’s clearly a human’s intention.
It’s absolutely AI. The inconsistent arm length, the distorted/melty flowers in the third panel, the bottom of the TV stand, some other kinda melty/bendy lines here and there. The only thing to discuss really is whether or not pure AI art that isn’t sloppy like this comic should be allowed or not because of the ethical implications of AI.
inconsistent arm length
Because it is impossible for humans to get anatomy wrong, or just not care. Right panel is a compromise: Gesture wants negative space to the right (gal is running), panel width is limited, don’t want to cut off hand, so make arms different length it’s a comic FFS.
the distorted/melty flowers in the third panel
Because everything humans paint is hyperrealistic and infinite detail. Impressionist technique doesn’t exist.
the bottom of the TV stand
…what? Best guess I have is that you think that it’s geometrically wrong but it just doesn’t have a door, drawers, or such. Which btw would break the composition.
kinda melty/bendy lines here and there
Smudge tool don’t exist.
Can you not see the image I posted in the comment? Anyways, the flowers are not merely blurred or smudged. The way the petals are drawn is not how a human would draw them. Looks at the lines on the petals. Don’t think that I mistake imperfection for AI generation.
this specific style has been proliferating the past few weeks. there’s some new model that’s really good at just two-tone comics. it’s immediately obvious when doing a side-by-side.
This is better evidence, but still would be difficult to keep such consistency with the character. That would be quite the advancement itself.
Reverse image searching this reveals this comic was first posted on facebook four months ago, and a mix of similar AI and human drawn comics, so yeah I would say that checks out.
I love this interpretation.
AI, booo
Who is the artist that drew this?
Screams AI to me lol
The text gives it away; AI generated text always looks a bit off with its inconsistent sizing, kerning, and distortion.
Don’t rely on that. What was that old management manipulation tactic? Put a duck in everything you present, so management can say “that’s fine, just lose the duck” so they feel like they’ve left their mark and won’t be as likely to recommend changes that would add to your workload.
If you depend on that, you’re going to fall for a lot of things that don’t have such obvious tells.There’s a lot going on here that indicates AI, not the least being that for something that’s stylized to be a pencil illustration, the linework and colors are way too consistent. Also note:
- The truncated eyes in panels 1 and 3
- The paper generating spontaneously in the second panel
- The inconsistency in the grass patches in panel 3
As I previously mentioned, there’s no reason to think there isn’t a jump in time between panel 1 and 2. She hears something on the TV, only to later realize while working that there’s no reason for her to continue if she’s already been written off as worthless. Both the inconsistencies in her eyes and in the grass could easily be compression artifacts (zoom in on her hair to see very blocky compression artifacts as the algorithm fails to capture detail). There’s also the fact that errors could easily just be human, as artists do make all those types of mistakes.
The biggest thing that makes me think this is human made is the cropping on the left side, like someone cropped out the artist’s signature. If this is AI, the person who made it put a lot of trouble into some goofy 4d chess mind games
I mean, it is very clearly AI. If you need another thing, the hair covers the ears at different levels in each panel. Real artists don’t do that, because why the fuck would they bother drawing the ears different three times in one comic, AI doesn’t know any better.
Not the other person but I honestly can’t decide if this is Ai and I think your hair idea is a bit lacking.
In each panel she is in a different pose (posture) so naturally her hair is in a different position and maybe looks at different levels around the ears.
