I’m talking about like tax fraud and stuff.

Do you be the snitch, or do you be like Skyler White and join them?

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    No and no.

    Ponzi scheme or something like that? Yes, I would snitch. Bank robbery, please do not tell me. Cheating on taxes? I will judge you but no, not turn you in, if you get caught you get caught.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Neither? I’d wash my hands off the whole thing “on your head be it if this goes to shit”.0

    Not calling the authorities, also not going to need torture to tell them what I know if you get caught.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Ethics comes above personal relationships always. That being said, small-scale tax fraud doesn’t really seem pressing; there’s plenty of flexibility about what to ethically do about that.

    I’d have to duckduckgo where you even report that, because I don’t think it’s the normal police.

  • oceanA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I agree with other commenters that it depends on the crime against my own morals.

  • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Generally if a person or small business was harmed then I’ll report them but if it’s the government and they did tax fraud or evasion I couldn’t be bothered.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Serious, yes. Tax fraud, no.

    Tax fraud may be serious to the govt, and the punishment may be serious, but you’re not hurting an individual, you’re not putting anyone out if business or out of a job, you’re not committing treason, you’re not even displaying sociopathic tendencies. Maybe if it were on the scale of Trump’s tax fraud …

  • Libra00@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    First, Skyler was practically a hostage, and an unwilling participant at best. I would describe her more as an abuse victim who still stays with her partner than a collaborator.

    But to answer your question it’s always going to be a case-by-case basis because it really depends on the impact of what they’re doing and the harm it causes.

    • Defrauding the government? Meh, the government has been fucking us for generations, turnabout is fair play.

    • Stealing from some oligarch? Shit, need a partner? Eat the rich.

    • Embezzling from your small-business employer? That’s more likely to have a direct impact on your coworkers so I’d be concerned but still probably not.

    But more serious stuff like dealing hard drugs to kids, selling guns and bombs to crazy people, killing people, blowing shit up, etc? Yeah, now we have a problem. Now, what gets done about that problem also depends on the person, the activity, and the circumstances.

    • My husband came after me with a knife so I shot him? Cool, gimme a call if you need help hiding the body.
    • Help I accidentally murdered someone (and it really was an accident)? Gray area, the law probably needs to get involved but I would encourage them to come forward themselves rather than turn them in. If they had a compelling reason not to I might help them or might stay out of it depending on circumstance.
    • My wife wouldn’t let me turn our home into the set of a realtiy TV show so I could be a star so I beat her to death (an actual thing that happened)? Hello officer, it was this guy right here.
    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Agreed. Are they punching up or down? What’s the potential harm and who will it harm?

      If they’re just setting themselves up for disaster it’s probably best to remain hands-off and distance yourself. If they have a family I’d at least tell them what an idiot they are and then distance myself. Probably might be worth checking with the partner and tell them to protect themselves if they aren’t part of it.

      And yeah, like you said, anything causing harm to innocent parties like selling hard drugs or guns is a non-starter.

      • Libra00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Yeah, their reasons for doing it matter too obviously. If they’re just fucking over other people to enrich themselves then I am much more likely to report them (and also stop being friendly, cause that’s not the kind of person I want to spend my time with.)

        Also re:selling guns I should clarify - I don’t have an issue with selling guns, even illegally, unless they’re selling to people who shouldn’t have them.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Every family and relationship is different, I guess. I feel like active extortion would make the dinners a bit weird for me.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 day ago

    If it harmed an innocent, probably. If it harmed a government, corporation, or detestable person, no.

  • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Snitch on a loved one? Never. If I thought it was ethically or morally wrong, I would tell them what I think about it. Good people also make mistakes, and good people can change.

    • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What if your family member deliberately molested a young child, would you not want to get that child help? Even if you refused to tell the police, you would need to tell someone related to that child and 99/100 cases would result in them reporting the abuse to police.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    I feel like this is the kind of question that needs a whole lot of details before it is answerable.

    Tax fraud? Absolutely fuck not.

    Drunk driving? Probably I would give them a single “Hey next time I find out you’re doing that I am calling the cops on you” warning shot.

    Stealing from their company? Depends, what does the company do and who owns it? Again almost certainly not.

    And so on.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If it’s non-violent, no. never.

    As a general rule, I don’t call the cops on anyone unless that person’s death will prevent immediate harm to others.

    Cause if you call the cops on someone, you do put that person (and their neighbors) in mortal danger.

    • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Wow, where do you live? This just sounds crazy to have to worry about this when deciding whether to involve the cops.

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Going to guess America, since all of those rules apply for dealing with U.S. police. If you call them, you have to expect someone to die.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          “Expect” seems a bit dramatic, since it’s not like they gun down someone on every call. Be prepared for the possibility, maybe.

    • Libra00@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      What about taking the direct (early) Breaking Bad example: they’re not gunning people down in the street, but their product is definitely getting poeple, including children, addicted. It’s non-violent, let’s say they don’t even hire people to shoot competitors or whatever, but it is inarguably causing people significant, probably life-long harm.

    • hoi_polloi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      It goes like this. If you have a problem and you call the cops, you now have two problems. It’s up to you to decide if the first problem is worth getting into the second.