• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Ironically, so does your comment. You mean actively and forcibly ejecting refugees.

      The economic vs. refugee character of the people he ejected is unclear AFIAK, though.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Oh, negative morally.

          How does it do that? These were Colombian citizens being moved unwillingly, not refugees.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Saying the president is already unpopular and now he won’t take these people makes it sound like taking refugees would boost his popularity

            Trump however by doing this shows he thinks taking refugees is a bad thing

            Forcibly relocating refugees doesn’t make them no longer refugees, it just makes you (the one relocating them) a bad person/in violation of international law

  • sirpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Getting married to a Colombian woman as an America. Is this going to hinder her from getting a marriage visa and coming to America with me?

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      With all the executive orders he’s spewing forth, I wouldn’t be surprised if you run into some roadblocks, if only out of confusion on the part of immigration officials. For both your sakes, I hope it isn’t too disruptive. Mazel tov!

    • Edgarallenpwn@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      When did you submit the marriage visa? Also congrats! My wife is also Colombian and these last few days have been a fun time

      Edit: I wish I could supply more information directly, but I am still trying to learn the visa processes. A local immigrant lawyer runs a daily Q&A stream if you want to hop in and see if you can get a slot to ask about your situation. Link: Jim Hacking immigration law. Dood is a good guy who doesn’t bullshit and gets straight to the point. I hope everything goes well for you and your SO

      • sirpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        We are getting married at the notary today so she hasn’t applied for it yet! I am here I Colombia with her so sorry for the late reply. Internet is spotty I will look better when I arrive at her house. Thank you!

        • Edgarallenpwn@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yay! Wishing you both the best. I feel weird promoting a YouTube stream but it’s helping me learn a lot by just listening and hearing people’s stories. I believe the Zoom number and Whatsapp numbers are posted on his page. Looks like today’s is scheduled for 3:30PM COT/UTC -5 and tomorrow’s is 6:30PM COT/UTC -5.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    It would be a good idea that Mexico, Columbia and other latin countries promote the Trump Wall, but expelling all US residents in their countries. A wall always works in both directions.

  • Krik@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You missed the point where the people were cuffed the whole flight, were dehydrated and transported in military planes like cattle. That’s why those planes were rejected.

    The president send his own jet to get these people back because they are people not cattle.

    • skye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      So he saw these people were transported like cattle, dehydrated and mistreated, and instead of letting them get off the planes, he’s sent them back in those same planes so he can retrieve them with normal planes?

      Unless I am missing something, I feel like you’d want those people to not fly in a plane like that again.

      Either the plane didn’t take off in the first place, case in which rejecting it would make sense.

      Or those planes landed in Colombia, then sent back so they can be brought in proper planes, extending the suffering for no reason.

      • Krik@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The planes (there were two) landed in Brasil. I don’t know if that’s where they came from in the first place.

        A note: Usually these people are brought back using normal commercial flights. Only this time they used military planes.

        • skye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I see. I thought they landed in Colombia but were sent back to the U.S.

          Thank you for the clarification

  • sunglocto@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Seems like Trump’s strategy is to now bully countries into getting what they want. "I want them out!!! I want Canada!!! I want Greenland!!!

    He’s basically the equivalent of the kid that flips over the monopoly table when someone bought a property before him.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If they won’t take them, maybe we could put all these Columbians in some sort of District. A District of Columbia filled with criminals. Wait, we already have that.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Look, I know that immigration is a contentious issue, but sanctioning a country for not repatriating its citizens is a disproportionate response. Trump and Co. are really obsessed with immigration to even do this. It says a lot what values they have.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Are those people really Columbian citizens? I would not put it past Trump to just command ICE to land the next plane full of “somehow latin looking people” somewhere south of the border.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah, I just saw the news that Colombia gave in.

        Trump is going all in. He’s reverting to the 19th century way of strong arming other countries over petty things. He’s reviving the old-school capitalist imperialism.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      He does that to strongarm companies into complying, because it works. It’s also setting an example for other countries to cooperate.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I suppose, but we’re talking about international diplomacy. And a modern one at that.

        Trump’s strong arming sounds so 19th century though. His open threat of taking Panama canal, Canada, Greenland, and renaming the Gulf of Mexico is so manifest destiny.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Trump’s strong arming sounds so 19th century though

          20th century too! If a government didn’t do what we wanted them to do, we just couped their government, and installed a dictator.

          I mean, how do you think Sadaam Hussein got into power?

  • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Maybe the US should take back the US members of ISIS that have been left (along with the people from the other nations that joined ISIS) for the Kurds to keep.

    • reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Well you see, we have long and storied history of fucking over the Kurds. You wouldn’t want to tarnish that record would you?

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    “Criminals they forced into the United States” = “Invasion”

    “Repatriation” != “Deportation”

    Repatriation is what happens when you return a POW to their country of origin. Deportation is when you return a criminal to their country of origin.

    POWs are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system. They can be held indefinitely without charges, or returned to their country of origin, without judicial oversight. Since deportation is a judicial process, POWs are not subject to deportation.

    POWs are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of US law; Trump is arguing that the children of “invader-immigrants” can’t be citizens.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      POWs are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system.

      That’s… Not true.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        POWs do not need to be charged with a crime. Indeed, under international treaties and laws governing armed conflict, POWs generally can’t be criminally charged for simply participating in hostilities.

        They can be held without charge until the conclusion of hostilities. They are not entitled to the protections afforded to the accused, because they are not accused. They are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The term repatriation is not in any way exclusive to POWs. It was, for example, used extensively during COVID when talking about voluntary repatriation of expats to their home countries.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        True. I should have been more clear: Deportation requires the involvement of the judicial branch. Repatriation has no such requirement. “Repatriation” is a more generic term for returning to one’s country of origin.

        I did not mean to suggest that “repatriation” was exclusive to POWs, and I apologize if I gave that impression. I meant to distinguish between judicial and non-judicial.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      18 hours ago

      His base see it as him punishing Columbia and they’ll later be surprised at how much some things cost and blame liberals for it.

      • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You’re behind the news. Colombia caved within minutes. No tariffs. The idea was to push them to take their citizens back, and it worked.

        • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It was never about not accepting them. It was about them being treated with human dignity on the way there.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Once again the orange toddler throws a tantrum and gets his way.

          His cult is right about one thing - he gets shit done. It’s horrible shit, but he gets it done.