Let’s have a lunch and learn!

  • Einar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Alright, team, let’s circle back and ensure we’re fully aligned on our north star objectives. We need to leverage synergy, engage in blue-sky thinking, and touch base on our pain points to drive mission-critical outcomes. But let’s not boil the ocean with unnecessary jargon - at the end of the day, we need to optimize our bandwidth for real, value-driven impact. If we keep moving the needle with this kind of thought leadership theater, we risk losing sight of our core competencies and drowning in a sea of meaningless buzzwords. Let’s pivot toward clear, actionable insights and sunset the overuse of strategic messaging before it becomes a blocker to true innovation. Instead of just playing the fast-follow game with every trending framework, let’s focus on original, high-impact execution that actually drives results.

    Thoughts? Chris, do you have any builds?

    No?

    Good. Then let’s action this and drive it across the finish line!

          • Einar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Basically just means handling problems earlier rather than later, catching issues early instead of fixing them when they cause expensive issues.

            It usually means moving tasks earlier in a workflow. You could often also just say “start early”.

            There’s also “shift right”. 😄

    • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 days ago

      Perfect except for ‘Thoughts?’ Instead of that it should be an appeal to the speaker’s boss: ‘Chris, do you have any builds?’

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 days ago

      There was a website at some point that would put up themed meeting phrases each week, with points if anyone used them and caught it. I still remember a few of them.

      “I don’t want a pot of gold at the end of this rainbow, I expect a pot of uranium.”

      “We either play barbie or go home. I didn’t get come here today to be Skipper.”

      “I don’t say we build a barbie dream house, I want use to build a barbie on ecstasy house.”

      “Is this a queen alien problem? Or more of a face hugger we can ignore for a while?”

      • Einar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Thank you for reaching out. After a strategic review of available pathways, we regret to inform you that the requested course of action is not viable.

  • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    9 days ago

    I heard “rightsizing” for the first time last year.

    I have no idea what knucklehead PR dumbass came up with that but it made the following layoffs even more unpalatable.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      The only time I hear rightsizing is for cloud resources. I’ve never heard of it in human resources. That sucks.

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    “Tribal knowledge.”

    • image: We, clan. Together, strong.
    • reality: Ask Tommy if he remembers how to reset the printer

    Though, I actually like this one. It’s a pretty cool phrase you can use anywhere.

    • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      This is normally called “institutional knowledge” which is definitely a real thing, I don’t think it’s a marketing or HR buzzword. Though, a lot of the time it somewhat trivial things those things do add up. Institutional knowledge around things like how to deal with a finicky piece of specialized hardware, or what are the right words to convince your bosses boss to pay for you to go to a conference are pretty helpful. If you have an older “individual contributor” in your company that has been there for a while and hasn’t climbed the ladder, they might be a gold mine for that kinda info (they could also just be an ass)

    • nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      wow I was not expecting to find something worthwhile in here but I will definitely be using that lol

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Def all over the business world. It’s more polite than saying “okay, let’s have a 5 minute break from this meeting so everyone can piss and get some more coffee”

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’ve never heard it in a business environment. Even as a IT engineer.

        My friend manages a team of engineers and TAMs for massive companies that do stuff like make airplanes and manage phone networks and you know the names. They specifically produce a toolsuite and rent out pro-serv nerds to go to mammoth DCs and show people where they fucked up their cabling and double the throughput. Like, SO nerdy.

        ‘bio break’ is used a few times a day.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago
          1. Its unprofessional.
          2. Its gross. Saying something thats basically “gonna go take a dump” is unnecessary. Personally I don’t give two shits, but not everyone is as easygoing as me. Best to keep a professional hat on at work.

          I did use it at work once and a single “Dude TMI” was all it took for me to stop. Online playing an MMO as a group is casual and often used as a trigger for a group break.

          At work I just say “going to step away for a bit” and that’s all that’s needed.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 days ago

      I like it because it’s so vague.

      A nap is pretty biological! And nobody will ask why your bio break was an hour long.

    • monsterpiece42@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah, hate this. To everyone saying it’s not corporate: or certainly is. I did B2B work for around a hundred corps through the one I worked at and I heard it at probably 70% of them.

      It’s just the company trying to control literally every part of your life. Like who gives a shit what I do on my break? That, and you can’t get an “extra” break later saying you have to pee.

    • ghost_towels@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I work at a school and that one gets used sometimes. A lady that helps us develop programming said it quite often and my colleagues picked it up, I don’t use it myself.

    • bdot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      fuck. i hate this one the most.

      just say “break.” let everyone else decide for themselves if it needs to be biological in nature.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Bio break.

      My friend uses that all the time.

      It means a pee break, a tea break, sometimes a ‘walk rover’ break. When meetings cross that 44-min mark, it’s break time.

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t use that, I usually just say I’m going to go grab some water but it’s better than saying “brb ima go take a wicked piss”. That being said, I’d respect the hell out of anyone who said that

  • jade52@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    9 days ago
    1. Alignment
    2. Scalable
    3. Circle back

    If you use these regularly I KNOW the meeting you just booked me into should have been an email.

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        I wouldn’t actually mind “circle back” if it wasn’t just used as cover to kick the can down the road.

        • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          For me the guy who always said it was a former boss and he was good at actually circling back, but sometimes it felt more like “fuck that for now.”

      • jade52@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 days ago

        I spend more time in meetings talking about the work I’m going to do, than doing the actual fucking work.

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 days ago

          Bro I have my first “big company” job after working smaller places for over a decade. This feels so real. I’m dying.

        • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          I’m not in many meetings but when I am, I oversell and overpromise then immediately forget everything we discussed as soon as it ends.

          Just send a fucking email.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Unless there is a need for faster communication or because it covers a topic that people have strong emotions about and need to see how others respond so they don’t assume the other person’s feelings about something. There are some cases where humans, being social animals, do need some interaction beyond words to accomplish coordinated tasks.

        The vast majority of meetings should be emails though. Just wish people actually read emails…

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I always want to do things by email instead of a meeting, but have to admit the meeting is often necessary. Of course it wouldn’t be if people could actually read and comprehend a detailed email and if they could also actually communicate information into writing without expecting you to be their minds enough to make sense of the incomplete vague phases they hurriedly type.

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Can we put a pin in that and circle back later? Maybe parking lot it and we can discuss it at the end of the call

    • JPSound@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’ve heard “human capital” before. The soulless fucks make others a commodity by stripping the mere mention of their existance of its humanity.

  • feddup@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Leadership at the company I work for started saying “let’s double click that” to mean let’s go into more detail on that topic. Hate it.

    Also “let’s take this offline” which just means let’s have a different meeting about it, it’ll still be online because we’re all remote.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Oh snap I should have read more comments before posting about “double clicking”. I hate it.

      I’ve been hearing “velocity” a lot recently and that also makes me cringe.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Also “let’s take this offline” which just means let’s have a different meeting about it, it’ll still be online because we’re all remote.

      See, I would think that would mean for more individual discussion, as in “this isn’t relevant to this meeting, why don’t you and I talk about this after the meeting or at a later point.”

      I think everyone has those coworkers who see meetings as an opportunity to ask about things with no relevance to anyone else in the room and makes everybody sit through 10 minutes (per discussion) about an issue that only pertains to them, instead of just going to the manager/whatever’s office in their own time to ask about their personal situation.

      If it’s just to table it until another meeting, though, that doesn’t make any sense.

      • feddup@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I think in many cases it results in separate discussion over slack, probably between managers but it still often ends up in a follow up meeting.

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      In my experience, “take this offline” means they don’t want to have the discussion in front of present company.

      For example, mentioning anything less-than-ideal in a meeting in front of large groups. It’s basically a thinly veiled way to control morale through selective information.

      • feddup@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        I guess it depends on the company, so far mine it’s just making more meetings but keeping the current one focused. I’m fine with that, just hate the expression because it only makes sense if the follow up meeting was in person but we’re all remote

        • insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Looks like everyone has ignored that you’re talking about the expression not the act. I also hate take it offline, I’ll just say… this sounds like a separate meeting.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      The first one is an Abomination unto Nuggan. I’m OK with the second one being used in a meeting to divert a topic that needs covered but is getting off tack.

    • sibannac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Take it offline as in turning it off? “We’re taking the service offline” or “Let’s talk about this face to face?”

      • feddup@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Nope, all in a teams meeting discussing something, topic diverges or becomes too complicated and is slowing the meeting. Manager says “let’s take this offline” or “we’ll discuss offline”. Keeps the meeting focused but I hate the phrase. It’s not offline because it’ll just be another teams meeting!

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Do you have a better way to phrase it? I usually see this to mean “focus on this topic rather than get distracted. We can discuss that later” … or I guess that’s a better way to phrase it

      • feddup@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Let’s take that offline perhaps better as let’s discuss that separately/later.

        Double clicking should just be something like “to go into more detail” or something. I get why it happens, easy and quick to say, i just find it so irritating.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          let’s discuss that separately/later

          That can come off as, “Not now dumbass.” The new slang comes off as, “Yeah, needs covered, and we will, but not now.”

          As always though, it’s all in the tone.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I don’t play Balatro but from what I know about it, the game probably uses it correctly, unless it has nothing to do with, like, playing two cards that work better when used together.

        In corpo speak. I’ve seen it used as a synonym for “energy.” Like after the crowd quiets down, “Wow! The synergy in the air tonight is electric!” makes me cringe so hard.

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 days ago

    I had one retail manager who constantly kept using “moving forward” for everything. It was so freaking grating!

    I hate that I’ve learned to censor myself around these soulless void-skulls by replacing “problem” with “challenge.” No, I don’t “solve problems”, because to acknowledge something as a problem is negativity we just don’t need here at Emperor Clothing Inc! I “tackle challenges”!

    It’s so freaking goofy and they just eat it up. Everything needs some sort of business-positive spin or they lose their minds and think you’re not being a “team player.”

    • invertedspear@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’ve got a manager that’s replaced problem with “opportunity to succeed”. Well, I’ve got 99 opportunities to succeed I guess.

    • qevlarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Seeing opportunities everywhere. The same underlying mechanism is at work here as with challenge: Let’s replace the word for this bad thing with a different word that means something similar but positive. And then it looks like something good! I am very smart

  • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Department / Corporate Retreat”

    As in, “we’re holding our annual corporate retreat next Wednesday! It’ll be offsite, you’re all required to be there, and we’ll be spending the day having a 6 hour meeting about absolutely nothing, just like we do every year. But dont worry, when we’re done we’ll play a game no one wants to play, or do a craft no one wants to do, but everyone will pretend they enjoy it because if they don’t, they’re not ‘team players.’”

    This year, our day-long-nothing-meeting was about how management is working to secure everyone’s jobs despite budget cuts, and we have nothing to worry about. Then we took a personality quiz that said I was a character from Stranger Things. Then the next day, they told me I’m getting laid off and have 3 months left at the company.

    Fucking RETREATS are so relaxing.

  • TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 days ago

    “We work hard and play hard” makes my skin crawl. Also, had a manager who would describe every situation with a war analogy. Sorry Bob, this is Finance, we’re not literally killing each other. Take it down a notch.